Final week I wrote a couple of cat, Edna, that had been dwelling in a San Francisco Hearth Division station, till somebody complained and Edna was evicted.
The reason: Hearth station pets haven’t been permitted right here for the final 20 years, as a result of medical provides and gear are saved and distributed to ambulance crews from this explicit station. Pets pose a sanitation challenge.
I requested readers and subscribers to the Pet Pal Connection e-newsletter to vote, keep or go, and the response was overwhelmingly in favor of keep. Many readers additionally referred to as out hearth division officers, and demanded that Edna be allowed to remain.
Listed below are a number of the feedback.
DEAR JOAN: We at Palo Alto Humane Society consider that Edna’s house is in that fireplace station and he or she ought to be allowed to remain.
Quite a few research have proven how remedy animals assist out within the office, offering consolation and constructive interplay in addition to growing productiveness of the employees. Hearth station workers are underneath super stress and danger their lives every day to guard the group, and so they notice that Edna performs an vital, and might we are saying irreplaceable, function all through their work day.
It has saddened us to assume that the only real complainant is extra probably than not unaware of the worth of a remedy cat in a aggravating work setting. Sure, we’re dismayed by that criticism and by the significance given to that one criticism versus the general profit Edna affords to everybody else on the station.
In any respect ranges and all venues of PAHS’ education schemes, we stress the significance of animals in our lives, reflecting on the human-animal bond and underscoring the roles performed by service and remedy animals. We talk about why home animals are so properly suited to serving to us and level out the various advantages they supply. Our youngest college students are ready to reply to our questions concerning the methods during which their pets assist them.
It’s mind-boggling that the decision-makers within the San Francisco Hearth Division have chosen to devalue the simplest of ideas round the advantages of companion remedy and repair animals.
Thanks once more for giving involved readers the chance to reply to this challenge.
Leonor Delgado, schooling supervisor, Palo Alto Humane Society
DEAR JOAN: Sure, Edna ought to keep! It has been her dwelling for five years and he or she could be extremely traumatized. Who might be so imply?
Sue Burchfield, Bay Space
DEAR JOAN: That is ridiculous that an harmless animal ought to be evicted from the hearth station. Why? What might she have executed that might name for eviction? Ridiculous. Edna ought to keep.
Betty Shorey, Bay Space
DEAR JOAN: She ought to stick with the those that rescued her. She feels protected with them, to not point out the stress aid she offers for them on their protected return from a aggravating job.
Edna stays. Whoever complained must go.
Suzy, Bay Space
DEAR JOAN: In fact, she ought to be allowed to remain. The rationale given for her eviction — that she would possibly contaminate saved medical provides — is ludicrous. The one who complained about her ought to be the one evicted.
Rudi, Bay Space
For extra pets and animals protection comply with us on Flipboard.