SACRAMENTO — 4 months after California voters rejected an effort to broaden hire management, lawmakers are again with a proposal to loosen decades-old restrictions, permitting native governments to position extra properties beneath hire management.
That invoice and three others geared toward defending renters — via anti-gouging caps, a statewide rental registry and eviction protections — observe unprecedented run-ups in market-rate rents over the previous 5 years, notably within the Bay Space. However some, if not all, are positive to be challenged by the identical highly effective real-estate pursuits that spent over $70 million to defeat Proposition 10 in November.
The renters’ rights teams and anti-poverty advocates pushing the payments known as on the Legislature to help the bundle.
“As we work to handle California’s excessive scarcity of reasonably priced housing, we should additionally prioritize the wants of low-income renters who’re threatened with homelessness by skyrocketing rents,” mentioned Alexander Harnden, Coverage Advocate at Western Middle on Regulation & Poverty, in a information launch.
Here’s a have a look at the 4 payments launched Thursday:
Meeting Invoice 1482, by David Chiu: This anti-rent-gouging invoice as but to assign a proportion to the allowable hire improve per yr. It’s now listed as “CPI+__%.” This may solely apply to models not already coated by native ordinances.
Meeting Invoice 36, Richard Bloom, D-Santa Monica: This invoice would loosen — however not repeal — a controversial state legislation often called Costa Hawkins, which makes it unlawful for cities to impose hire controls on single-family properties, rented condominiums and flats constructed after 1995 — or in some instances, even earlier. Below AB 36, cities can be allowed to position hire controls on buildings 10 years or older and on single-family properties — apart from landlords who personal only one or two models.
Two years in the past, Bloom launched a invoice to repeal Costa Hawkins. That invoice died in its first committee listening to, paving the way in which for Proposition 10, the rent-control poll measure that voters defeated, 59-41, in November
Meeting Invoice 1481, Rob Bonta, D-Oakland: Bonta is again this yr with one other try to require landlords statewide to offer a motive for evicting a tenant, a coverage embraced by tenants’ rights teams often called “Simply Trigger for Evictions.” Most cities with hire management laws have already got this coverage on the books, however this might broaden it throughout the state
Meeting Invoice 724, Buffy Wicks, D-Richmond: This invoice would create a statewide rental registry, giving lawmakers and others higher details about the variety of rental models.