LONDON (Reuters) – Prime Minister Theresa Might’s Brexit plans have been thrown into additional turmoil on Monday when the speaker of parliament dominated that she couldn’t put her divorce deal to a brand new vote until it was re-submitted in basically completely different kind.

In feedback that blindsided Might’s workplace, Speaker John Bercow mentioned the federal government couldn’t deliver ahead proposals for a vote in parliament that have been considerably the identical as had been defeated twice earlier than, in January and final week.

Brexiteers searching for an entire break from the European Union noticed a “no-deal” exit as now extra seemingly, however the authorities made clear it might search to place off Brexit past the March 29 departure date, if the EU approves.

One of many authorities’s senior regulation officers, Solicitor Basic Robert Buckland, mentioned: “We’re in a serious constitutional disaster right here.”

He advised the BBC one approach to deliver Might’s deal again for a vote within the Home of Commons could possibly be prorogation – ending the parliament session prematurely and beginning a brand new one.

In response to precedents stretching again to 1604, parliamentary guidelines say that considerably comparable proposals can’t be voted on within the Home of Commons greater than as soon as throughout the identical session of parliament.

Bercow mentioned his ruling shouldn’t be thought of his final phrase and the federal government might deliver ahead a brand new proposition that was not the identical as these already voted upon.

The pound fell to its day’s low towards the euro and the greenback on Bercow’s assertion, earlier than recovering when the federal government mentioned negotiations on a deal have been persevering with with lawmakers from Northern Eire, who prop up Might’s minority authorities and have opposed her withdrawal accord to this point.

READ  NSW juvenile justice officers stroll off job after string of violent assaults by offenders

“That is my conclusion: if the federal government needs to deliver ahead a brand new proposition that’s neither the identical, nor considerably the identical, as that disposed of by the Home on the 12th of March, this is able to be solely so as,” Bercow mentioned.

“What the federal government can not legitimately do is to resubmit to the Home the identical proposition or considerably the identical proposition as that of final week which was rejected by 149 votes.”

The ruling was welcomed by eurosceptic lawmakers in Might’s Conservative Occasion as a result of it appeared to extend the chance of Britain leaving the EU and not using a deal.

Might’s Withdrawal Settlement negotiated with the EU final 12 months was seen by Brexiteers as leaving Britain too carefully aligned to the EU whereas depriving it of voting rights within the bloc.

“Might I say how delighted I’m that you’ve got determined to comply with precedent, which is one thing I’m tremendously in favor of,” mentioned Jacob Rees-Mogg, chairman of the European Analysis Group of eurosceptics in parliament.

Nonetheless Kwasi Kwarteng, a Brexit minister, advised parliament the federal government supposed to hunt an extension to the Brexit departure deadline, which he anticipated the EU to determine on at a summit this week.

The pinnacle of the 2016 referendum marketing campaign to depart the EU, Matthew Elliott, mentioned he anticipated lawmakers to “see sense” and cross Might’s deal by March 29.

READ  Tony Abbott describes circumstances on Nauru as 'very, very nice'


Bercow’s pronouncement appeared to take Might’s Downing Avenue workplace unexpectedly.

Might’s spokesman mentioned her workplace had not been warned the assertion was coming. Nor might Downing Avenue say something about plans for a brand new Brexit vote or when it may be held.

Speaker of the Home John Bercow speaks in Parliament, in London, Britain, March 18, 2019, on this display seize taken from video. Reuters TV by way of REUTERS

“Now the federal government must come again with substantial modifications (which is actually unimaginable) in relation to the deal, in any other case it means a protracted Brexit delay,” mentioned Naeem Aslam, chief market analyst at retail dealer Suppose Foreign exchange.

EU leaders have dominated out renegotiating the exit deal.

“The possibilities of the UK crashing out of the EU have elevated as soon as once more as a result of the EU wants a transparent plan and a technique earlier than they grant an extension,” Aslam added.

Earlier on Monday it had appeared that Might was successful help for her deal from erstwhile opponents however Bercow’s resolution will go away the prime minister scrambling for choices.

Requested by a lawmaker whether or not additional modifications to the deal can be wanted, Bercow mentioned, “in all chance, the reply … is sure”, including {that a} change in opinion wouldn’t represent a change within the deal on provide.

“Essentially, for one thing to be completely different, it needs to be by definition, basically completely different. Not completely different when it comes to wording, however distinction when it comes to substance and that is within the context of a negotiation with others outdoors the UK,” Bercow mentioned.

READ  Hearth guts buying advanced in Brisbane's south

Britain is because of go away the EU by default in 11 days. However parliament voted final week for a delay and Might is predicted to hunt an extension to that deadline when she meets EU leaders at their summit.

To compound her issues, Might appeared unlikely to achieve settlement this week on her Brexit plans with the Democratic Unionists, the small Northern Irish social gathering whose help is important if she is to get her EU departure deal by way of parliament.

Might’s spokesman mentioned talks have been persevering with with the DUP.

Might had earlier warned lawmakers that until they approve her Brexit divorce blueprint, Britain’s exit from the EU might face a protracted delay which many Brexiteers concern would imply Britain might by no means go away.

Slideshow (6 Pictures)

After two-and-a-half years of negotiations with the EU, the result stays unsure – with choices together with a protracted postponement, exiting with Might’s deal, a economically disruptive exit and not using a deal, and even one other EU membership referendum.

Might’s blueprint, an try and retain shut buying and selling and safety ties with the EU whereas leaving the bloc’s formal political buildings, was defeated by 230 votes in parliament on Jan. 15 and by 149 votes on March 12.

Writing by Man Faulconbridge and Giles Elgood, Modifying by William Maclean and Janet Lawrence

Our Requirements:The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here