PALO ALTO — In response to Santa Clara County ‘s circumstances on its proposed enlargement, Stanford despatched a letter Tuesday saying the college is being singled out to supply extra housing than different initiatives whereas the county itself hasn’t achieved sufficient to encourage housing growth.
“The causes of the regional scarcity in market-rate housing provide are multi-faceted,” Stanford Affiliate Vice President Catherine Palter wrote to the county. “Stanford has not brought about this scarcity. Actually, Stanford believes the market would provide way more housing if the County had been to encourage housing growth on the entire residential lands it regulates.”
The letter takes subject with the county’s requirement that Stanford quadruple the quantity of workforce housing initially deliberate, says the college ought to get credit score for houses it’s already planning to construct and asks that it’s allowed to construct extra houses off campus than the county calls for.
Stanford’s proposed enlargement, which might happen over twenty years, contains including 3.5 million sq. toes of educational services, together with for transportation and youngster care, 2,600 scholar beds and 550 college and workers housing items. The county not too long ago added a requirement that Stanford improve workforce housing nearly fourfold from the proposed 550 to 2,172.
Stanford desires the county to provide it credit score towards housing items required for 2 initiatives authorised earlier than the enlargement request. Particularly, it’s searching for credit score for half of 1,300 new on-campus graduate scholar housing deliberate for 2020 and for 215 college and workers residences deliberate for Menlo Park.
Stanford additionally desires to alter a county requirement that 70 % of latest housing items be constructed on campus, citing suggestions from workers who mentioned they like to reside off campus. Within the letter, Palter requested that 70 % of market-rate items be constructed off campus, inside a six-mile radius, and 70 % of inexpensive items be constructed on campus.
Palter mentioned Stanford is “prepared to rise to the problem and take a management function by embracing the chance to construct extra housing” if the county adjustments a few of its its necessities.
The letter comes forward of Thursday’s second Planning Fee public listening to on a normal use allow for the Stanford enlargement, the most important growth software the county has ever obtained.
On the first public listening to in Palo Alto on Might 31, a number of audio system known as on the college to decide to extra housing for graduate college students, college and workers to accommodate new workers and cut back pressures on the native housing provide.The college additionally pushed again at calls to supply one housing unit for every new worker.
“Taken to the acute, this conjures up failed firm cities,” Palter wrote. “Dropping a spot of residence on the similar time an individual adjustments their employment might create an obstacle to mobility.”
The college is also asking the county to alter limits on what number of automobiles can enter and go away campus, noting that the county’s requirement for extra on-campus housing might convey 5,000 extra workers there. As an alternative of capping the variety of automotive journeys allowed, Palter mentioned Stanford might make funds to offset the influence of additional site visitors created by the venture on native roads and intersections.
Planning Director Jacqueline Onciano mentioned in a cellphone name Tuesday that county workers received’t change any of its suggestions, leaving that option to commissioners after they vote on circumstances for the venture’s normal use allow.
“It’s totally as much as the Planning Fee,” Onciano mentioned.
The subsequent public hearings on the Stanford enlargement are Thursday at 1:30 p.m. and June 27 at 1:30 p.m. within the Isaac Newton Senter Auditorium, 70 W. Hedding St. in San Jose.
Contact Thy Vo at 408-200-1055 or [email protected]