Actor John Jarratt has told a Sydney court he was "seduced" into consensual sex by a woman who's now accused him of rape more than 40 years ago.© ABC Information Pictures
Actor John Jarratt has advised a Sydney court docket he was “seduced” into consensual intercourse by a girl who’s now accused him of rape greater than 40 years in the past.

Wolf Creek actor John Jarratt will proceed with defamation motion towards Sydney’s The Day by day Telegraph newspaper, after a jury discovered him not responsible of rape.

The authorized motion towards Nationwide Information was commenced within the NSW Supreme Courtroom in November final 12 months, pending the result of the 66-year-old’s trial.

On Friday, a District Courtroom jury returned a unanimous not responsible verdict.

The actor’s high-profile lawyer, Chris Murphy, took to Twitter to announce the proceedings towards the writer of papers together with Sydney’s The Day by day Telegraph, would now be going forward.

READ  Snowmobile driver makes dangerous entrance flip whereas driving

“The civil Assertion of Declare was filed pending decision of police expenses,” he stated.

“Paperwork will now be served on the defendant.

“John Jarratt v Nationwide Information court docket point out 18th August.”.

The authorized motion comes simply months after Nationwide Information was ordered to pay practically $2.9 million to actor Geoffrey Rush for defaming him.

The Day by day Telegraph printed allegations claiming Mr Rush had behaved inappropriately in the direction of a colleague throughout a 2015-16 Sydney Theatre Firm season of King Lear.

The newspaper’s fact defence failed, following a three-week trial final 12 months.

It has since launched an attraction towards the document payout.

‘I am simply so relieved’ John Jarratt stood trial within the NSW District Courtroom after insisting extramarital intercourse he had with a girl in a share home in 1976 was consensual.

READ  Nationwide Underwear Parade a fleshy first for Mid-Metropolis

The lady didn’t complain to police till late 2017, after being put in contact with journalists.

Mr Jarratt was charged in August 2018.

He advised police he first heard in regards to the alleged rape declare, which he referred to as a “scandalous lie”, when he examine it on the entrance web page of the Sydney newspaper.

Through the trial, Mr Jarratt described the girl’s account as “fantasy” and stated she lied to the jury about their “spontaneous” however consensual encounter.

When the not responsible verdict was returned, the 66-year-old raised his fingers within the air and members of the family started to cry within the public gallery.

READ  California mail provider who died on 117-degree day remembered

 Outdoors court docket, he stated he was “over the moon”.

“I am simply so relieved,” he stated.

“No man ought to must undergo what I went by way of.”

In a video posted to Fb by Chris Murphy shortly after the decision, Mr Jarratt and his spouse had been seen making a toast to the lawyer.

“To the godfather of regulation,” Mr Jarratt stated.

The video was captioned, “My shopper was a sufferer. John Jarratt celebrating. A lovely man. A sufferer… 100% Harmless.”

John Jarratt’s defamation motion can be subsequent talked about in court docket in August.

Nationwide Information declined to touch upon the defamation case.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here